Top 10 Reasons to #ExitTheWHO
Today (April 7, 2023) is the WHO’s 75th birthday. Let’s hope it is their last.
TAKE ACTION:
Everyone should CLICK HERE. If you live in the United States, CLICK HERE and HERE. Click on your country if you live in: Australia, Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom. Call me directly if you have any questions James Roguski +1-310-619-3055
The Top 10 Reasons Why the Member Nations Should #ExitTheWHO:
- CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CORRUPTION: The WHO is infiltrated by Big Pharma, Big Money, and Big Foundations and has been corrupted by financial donations from corporations and non-governmental organizations which influence WHO policy in ways that benefit the corporations and the organizations through a money-laundering and influence-peddling scheme of massive proportions. The WHO follows the dictates of it’s so-called “relevant stakeholders” while ignoring the needs and desires of “We the People.”
- VACCINE MADNESS: Influenced by vaccine manufacturers and vaccine pushers such as GAVI and Bill Gates, the WHO has lost sight of its core purpose of promoting health and has overemphasized the use of “vaccines” which have not improved health, but have actually degraded the overall health of billions of people around the world. Best practices designed to improve health are ignored in favor of actions ultimately designed to profit Big Pharma.
- BUREAUCRACY AND WASTE: The WHO is dominated by bureaucrats and technocrats that are beholden to big Pharma, not knowledgeable health professionals that are dedicated to caring for patients and helping them maintain and improve their health. The WHO wastes enormous amounts of money on salaries for their bloated staff and travel expenses to such a degree that actual health related programs are chronically underfunded.
- FEAR-MONGERING: The WHO has sounded the alarm and wasted time, effort and money by declaring FAKE Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEICs) such as Moneypox and Swine flu (H1N1) while failing to act swiftly or effectively to address Ebola and COVID-19.
- HORRIBLE RECOMMENDATIONS: The WHO has made horrible and corrupt recommendations in support of the expanded use of pharmaceutical drugs such as opiates that have been responsible for untold millions of unnecessary deaths.
- FALSE MODEL OF HEALTH: The WHO is overly dependent upon the petro-chemical based pharmaceutical, medical, hospital industrial complex which practices allopathic medicine that is designed to alter and mask symptoms rather than actually improve health. The WHO does not offer a forum for clinical and scientific discussion or debate and clearly marginalizes natural healing modalities.
- POWER GRAB: The WHO is blatantly seeking to increase its power by pursuing a legally-binding proposed “Pandemic Treaty” and proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
- MISTAKES: The WHO has repeatedly demonstrated that it is absolutely unwilling and incapable of learning from its mistakes of the past and is destined to continue wasting money while providing horrible advice based on the corruptive influence of Big Pharma and Bill Gates
- OUT-OF-TOUCH: The delegates to the World Health Assembly are unelected, unaccountable, unknown to the people they purport to represent and completely out of touch with the needs and desires of the people of their respective nations.
- SECRECY: The WHO operates in secrecy and lacks transparency. Far too much of what is done by the WHO remains hidden. What we know is horrible. What we don’t know may be monstrous.
Please watch the video below…
https://rumble.com/v20s8kq-the-weaponization-of-the-who-with-james-corbett.html
1. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CORRUPTION:
A conflict of interest occurs when private interests (financial, personal, or other non-WHO interest or commitment) interfere—or appear to interfere—with the ability of a WHO staff to act impartially, to discharge their functions and to regulate their conduct with the interests of WHO only in view.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/szuMnzyVj0Aa/
https://rumble.com/v19al9f-exposing-who-conflicts-of-interest-fahrie-hassan.html
Epidemic of Conflict of Interests
According to former World Bank geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig, about half of the WHO’s budget is derived from private sources — primarily pharmaceutical companies but also other corporate sectors including the telecommunication and agro-chemical industries. It also receives large donations from large philanthropic organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI. Twelve years ago, Gates had committed $10 billion to the WHO; after the US, his Foundation is its second largest donor providing 10 percent of its funding. His financial commitment aligned with his global ambition to “make this the decade of vaccines.” Koenig also believes that Tedros’s appointment was due to Gates’ influence. In fact, Tedros is a former Chair of GAVI’s Vaccine Alliance.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/hell-no-who-pandemic-treaty/5798100
Most people assume wrongly that the WHO acts independently from national and private commercial interests for the welfare of the world’s population. However, its real mission is dubious. The organization has frequently been accused of conflicts of interests with private pharmaceutical companies and mega-philanthropic organizations such as the Gates’ Foundation. It is riddled with political alliances, ideologies, and profiteering motives.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/hell-no-who-pandemic-treaty/5798100
When it was founded in 1948, the WHO relied on funding from its member states; their contributions were assessed based on their national income and population. The funds were not earmarked for any particular policy. In those days, the WHO was an independent organization. But over time, the WHO leadership traded its independence and with it, its integrity, for big money.
Currently, 80% of the WHO budget relies on earmarked donations; primarily from the U.S. government, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Big Pharma. The WHO revenue in 2016-2017 was $5.139 Billion, of which only $927 million came from assessed contributions by member states; these “core” funds cover the WHO’s general expenses. By contrast, $4.422 Billion were provided by major donors; and these funds are earmarked for activities that serve the donor’s financial interests. These major donors dictate and control the WHO policies, ensuring that WHO policies further their interests.
Over the past decade, the world’s richest man has become the World Health Organization’s second biggest donor, second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom. This largesse gives him outsized influence over its agenda, one that could grow as the U.S. and the U.K. threaten to cut funding if the agency doesn’t make a better investment case.
The result, say his critics, is that Gates’ priorities have become the WHO’s. Rather than focusing on strengthening health care in poor countries — that would help, in their view, to contain future outbreaks like the Ebola epidemic — the agency spends a disproportionate amount of its resources on projects with the measurable outcomes Gates prefers, such as the effort to eradicate polio.
Concerns about the software billionaire’s sway — roughly a quarter of WHO’s budget goes toward polio eradication — has led to an effort to rein him in.
https://www.politico.eu/article/bill-gates-who-most-powerful-doctor/
Millions of dollars given by major pharmaceutical companies to the World Health Organization (WHO) raise questions of compliance with the organization’s guidelines on interactions with commercial enterprises.
Currently, WHO’s relations with commercial enterprises are guided by the “Guidelines on interaction with commercial enterprises to achieve health outcomes” (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/78660/1/ee20.pdf?ua=1).
In 2014, WHO received $6,158,153 from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). It received $5,785,000 and $8,266,284 in 2012 and 2013 respectively from GSK.
Novartis AG donated $5,300,000 in 2014 and $4,500,000 in 2013.
Hoffmann-La Roche donated $6,158,153 in 2014 and $4,806,492 in 2013.
The purposes of those donations were not disclosed.
In 2015 GSK donated $4,094,000, Novartis donated $2,834,000, Roche donated $2,165,000 and Eli Lilly Company Foundation donated $1,218,000. All four companies earmarked their donations for specific areas set out in the agreements with the WHO Secretariat.
These donations raise prima facie concerns about the violation of provisions of the Guidelines which state that commercial enterprises working with WHO are expected to conform to various WHO policies including the ethical promotion of medicinal drug products.
According to paragraph 11 of the Guidelines, “Commercial enterprises working with WHO will be expected to conform to WHO public health policies in the areas of food safety, chemical safety, ethical promotion of medicinal drug products, tobacco control, and others”.
The financial contributions from these pharmaceutical companies raise prima facie concern with regard to the violation of paragraph 15 of the Guidelines that states: “Funds may not be sought or accepted from enterprises that have a direct commercial interest in the outcome of the project toward which they would be contributing, unless approved in conformity with the provisions on clinical trials or product development, set out below”.
These financial contributions thus raise doubts about the implementation of the Guidelines by the Secretariat. How can the WHO Secretariat be expected to scrutinise the conduct of the pharmaceutical companies concerned while accepting financial resources from them?
ΠΗΓΗ: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/top-10-reasons-to-exitthewho?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Πρόσφατα Σχόλια